ARTICLE
8 August 2024

Europe: ESMA's Call For Evidence On The UCITS Eligible Assets Directive Closes

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today closed its Call for Evidence (CfE) on the review of the UCITS Eligible Assets Directive (EAD). The CfE was published in May. It followed a request...
European Union Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has today closed its Call for Evidence (CfE) on the review of the UCITS Eligible Assets Directive (EAD).

The CfE was published in May. It followed a request from the European Commission (EC) to ESMA for technical advice on its review of the EAD. The EC in particular want ESMA to identify divergent approaches in different EU member states and to make recommendations on how to align the EAD with developments in the market since it was first published in 2007.

The CfE sought input from a variety of stakeholders on far reaching issues on the EAD, including the way in which UCITS may have gained direct and indirect exposures to asset classes such as structured loans, crypto assets, emission allowances and catastrophe bonds. In this connection, ESMA asked for views on whether a look-through approach could address the risks and benefits of UCITS gaining indirect exposure to asset classes that are not directly investible. It also sought insights on the notion of "liquidity", which is a frequently used term in the UCITS Directive and EAD, but which is not given a specific definition. The CfE also asked for views on perceived over-reliance on the presumption of liquidity and negotiability set out in the EAD.

ESMA will now assess feedback it has received to date and take it into account as it develops its technical advice for the Commission.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More