ARTICLE
30 November 2021

Reviewing The Tenure Of Justice Rita Garman (Part 6 Of 6)

AP
Arnold & Porter

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
Yesterday, we reviewed Justice Garman's civil majority and dissenting opinions. Today, we're looking at Justice Garman's criminal opinions.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Yesterday, we reviewed Justice Garman's civil majority and dissenting opinions.  Today, we're looking at Justice Garman's criminal opinions.

Justice Garman has written 38 majority opinions in constitutional law cases.  She has written 14 majorities in sentencing cases, 13 in habeas corpus cases, eight in cases involving juvenile justice issues, six in cases regarding sex offenses, five in death penalty cases, two in cases involving violent crimes and one case involving property crimes.

1136722a.jpg

Justice Garman wrote 28 majority opinions in criminal procedure cases.  She wrote three mental health decisions, two cases involving drug offenses and one majority opinion each in cases involving process crimes, political crimes, driving offenses and attorney discipline.

1136722b.jpg

Justice Garman has written six criminal dissents in constitutional law cases and six in criminal procedure cases.  She has written two habeas corpus opinions, two in cases involving sex offenses and two in cases involving violent crimes.  She has also written one death penalty case, one in a sentencing case, one in a juvenile justice case and one in an attorney discipline case.

1136722c.jpg

Join us back on the California Supreme Court Review tomorrow morning as we complete our review of Justice Carol Corrigan's tenure.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More