ARTICLE
25 November 2021

Reviewing The Tenure Of Justice Rita Garman (Part 5 Of 6)

AP
Arnold & Porter

Contributor

Arnold & Porter is a firm of more than 1,000 lawyers, providing sophisticated litigation and transactional capabilities, renowned regulatory experience and market-leading multidisciplinary practices in the life sciences and financial services industries. Our global reach, experience and deep knowledge allow us to work across geographic, cultural, technological and ideological borders.
This week, we're finishing our six-part review of Justice Garman's tenure by taking a closer look at her authored opinions.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This week, we're finishing our six-part review of Justice Garman's tenure by taking a closer look at her authored opinions.

Through the end of last week, Justice Garman has written 107 majority opinions and 28 dissents.

Justice Garman has written 24 majority opinions in tort cases.  She has written 18 majorities in civil procedure cases and thirteen each in constitutional law and government and administrative law cases.  She has written seven majority opinions involving insurance law and workers compensation law.  She has written five majority opinions in commercial law cases, three involving secured transactions and one employment law case.

1135442a.jpg

Justice Garman has written four majority opinions in domestic relations cases.  She has written three majorities in tax law and election law cases.  She has written two majority opinions in arbitration cases.  She has written one majority opinion each in environmental, wills and estates, judicial misconduct and property law cases.

1135442b.jpg

Justice Garman has written eight dissents in tort cases.  She has written six dissents in government and administrative law cases, six in civil procedure cases, three in domestic relations cases, two each in workers compensation and constitutional law cases and one in an employment law case.

1135442c.jpg

Join us back here tomorrow as we conclude our review of Justice Garman's tenure.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More