ARTICLE
5 October 2021

Federal Circuit Clarifies That There Is Not A Heightened Standard For Willful Infringement

FH
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP

Contributor

Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP is a law firm dedicated to advancing ideas, discoveries, and innovations that drive businesses around the world. From offices in the United States, Europe, and Asia, Finnegan works with leading innovators to protect, advocate, and leverage their most important intellectual property (IP) assets.
In SRI Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., No. 2020-1685 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 28, 2021), the Federal Circuit reinstated the jury's willful infringement verdict and restored the district court's award of enhanced damages.
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In SRI Int'l, Inc. v. Cisco Sys., Inc., No. 2020-1685 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 28, 2021), the Federal Circuit reinstated the jury's willful infringement verdict and restored the district court's award of enhanced damages.

In the first appeal for this case, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court's denial of judgment of a matter of law of no willful infringement and enhanced damages award.  On remand, the district court vacated the jury's verdict of willful infringement finding that Cisco's conduct did not rise to the level of "wanton, malicious, and bad-faith behavior." Finding no willful infringement, the district court declined to reinstate its previously vacated award of enhanced damages.

In this appeal, the Federal Circuit reinstated the jury's willfulness verdict, finding that substantial evidence supported the jury's verdict. In doing so, the Court clarified the distinction between conduct warranting enhanced damages and the lesser standard of willful infringement. Willful infringement requires "no more than deliberate or intentional infringement." Enhanced damages, however, are reserved for "wanton, malicious, and bad-faith behavior." The Federal Circuit also restored the district court's original award of enhanced damages, finding the award appropriate in view of the reinstated verdict of willful infringement and detecting no abuse of discretion in the original decision.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More