ARTICLE
30 October 2014

City Of Fort Collins, Colorado, Appeals Ruling Striking Down Fracking Bans

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The week of September 22, the Fort Collins, Colorado, City Council voted to appeal a decision rendered last month that struck down the city's fracking ban.
United States Energy and Natural Resources
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The week of September 22, the Fort Collins, Colorado, City Council voted to appeal a decision rendered last month that struck down the city's fracking ban. The North America Shale Blog previously covered that decision here.

In that August 2014 decision, a Larimer County District Court Judge ruled that Colorado's 1951 Oil and Gas Conservation Act ("Act") preempts the city's five-year moratorium on fracking that was set to expire on August 5, 2018. The decision addressed the conflict between Article XX of the Colorado Constitution, which gives local governments "home-rule" powers—defined as "the full right to self-government" on local and municipal matters—and local attempts to regulate oil and gas activities. The court reasoned that Article XX does not permit a city to enact ordinances in areas of mixed state and local concern, or areas of statewide concern that intrude on state law, meaning that a local ordinance may be preempted where it would "conflict with the operation of a state statute." The court then reasoned that the Act impliedly, though not expressly, preempted the city's five-year fracking ban because it impeded the state's interest in oil and gas development.

The Fort Collins resolution council voted 6-1 on Tuesday to direct the city's interim attorney to appeal that decision to the Colorado Court of Appeals and to seek a stay pending appeal. If successful, a stay of the decision would leave the fracking ban in place pending the outcome of the appeal. Before the vote, several citizens, including a representative of the group Citizens for a Healthy Fort Collins, made public comments in support of the appeal. This appeal will make Fort Collins the second Colorado city to appeal a decision striking down a local fracking ban. Fort Collins follows Longmont, Colorado, where a coalition of environmental groups appealed a similar Boulder County District Court decision to the Colorado Court of Appeals in September.

Additional coverage can be found here:

Fort Collins appeals judge's fracking decision

Fort Collins appealing judge's ruling on fracking ban

Fort Collins appealing to keep fracking ban

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More