ARTICLE
23 September 2020

Broker-Dealer Settles Charges For Failure To Supervise Trades Of Non-Traditional ETPs

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to develop and implement a sufficient supervisory system over sales of non-traditional exchange traded products,
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to develop and implement a sufficient supervisory system over sales of non-traditional exchange traded products (ETPs).

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA stated that the broker-dealer allowed two of its registered representatives to sell unsuitable non-traditional ETPs to retail customers. FINRA also said that the broker-dealer's supervisory system and written supervisory procedures failed to address: (i) the risks associated with non-traditional ETPs, including the potential risks of long-term holding of products that reset daily; (ii) how supervisors should ensure the suitability of non-traditional ETP recommendations; (iii) the establishment of exception reports for the monitoring of holding periods; and (iv) formal training for registered representatives regarding the sale of non-traditional ETPs. FINRA noted that the broker-dealer's failures occurred despite FINRA's publication of guidance emphasizing that broker-dealers need to establish a reasonable supervisory system, and written supervisory procedures, focused on the risks and suitability of non-traditional ETPs (see FINRA Regulatory Notices 09-31 and 12-03) .

FINRA found that the recommended and executed trades resulted in losses for customers. As a result of its findings, FINRA determined that the broker-dealer violated FINRA Rules 3110(a) ("Supervision - Supervisory System"), 3110(b) ("Supervision - Written Procedures") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to (i) a censure, (ii) a $35,000 fine, (iii) disgorgement of $2,982.84 in commissions and fees, plus interest, and (iv) restitution in the amount of $86,186, plus interest.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: Griffinest Asia Securities LLC

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More