Insider Trading And Off-Channel Communications: Remote And Hybrid Work Environment Checklist

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
This checklist discusses company risks related to insider trading (specifically regarding the misappropriation of material nonpublic information (MNPI)) and recordkeeping (specifically regarding off-channel communications) in remote and hybrid work environments.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This checklist discusses company risks related to insider trading (specifically regarding the misappropriation of material nonpublic information (MNPI)) and recordkeeping (specifically regarding off-channel communications) in remote and hybrid work environments. The checklist highlights recent cases brought by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and provides risk mitigation guidance.

Introduction

Though many, if not most, of the measures implemented to address the COVID-19 pandemic (the pandemic) have since been rolled back, the transition from fully in-person to remote and hybrid work environments appears to be here to stay. While these arrangements provide employees with additional convenience and flexibility, they also come with risks for companies that are subject to the recordkeeping provisions of federal securities laws and whose employees encounter MNPI in their work. Over the past few years, the SEC has been increasingly aggressive in bringing charges for violations of federal securities laws resulting, at least in part, from the risks associated with remote work environments.

From the beginning of the pandemic, the SEC warned about potential risks to market integrity posed by the transition to remote work. For example, in March 2020, the SEC issued a statement urging companies to be mindful of market integrity and confidentiality obligations. Stephanie Avakian and Steven Peikin, Co-Directors, Div. of Enf't, U.S. Secs. and Exch. Comm'n, Statement Regarding Market Integrity (Mar. 23, 2020). Given the unprecedented times, the SEC warned that remote work posed increased risks for insider trading and may lead a greater number of people to have access to MNPI than in normal times. They further cautioned that the MNPI "may hold an even greater value than under normal circumstances." In the years since, the SEC's concerns have materialized in a string of enforcement actions against individuals who gained access to MNPI as a result of the pandemic and misappropriated that information in pursuit of profit.

Remote Work Environments Risks: Insider Trading and MNPI

Remote work environments pose unique risks regarding the confidentiality of MNPI. Often housemates are working in close proximity, overhearing each other's work-related phone calls, and in reach of each other's laptops or printers. As the definition for MNPI continues to expand, more individuals are exposed to more MNPI than would have been in the pre-pandemic work environment, which means the opportunities for that information to be misappropriated have multiplied. Two high-profile cases within the last year indicate that the SEC is keenly aware of the increased risk and intent on bringing charges when misappropriation does occur.

  • June 2023. In June 2023, the SEC filed charges against Steven Teixeira and his friend Jordan Meadow, a broker-dealer, for insider trading. Jordan Meadow and Steven Teixeira, SEC Lit. Release No. 25765 (June 30, 2023) (2023 SEC Lexis 1688). Teixeira was in a romantic relationship with an executive assistant at an investment bank. Allegedly, while the executive assistant was working remotely due to the pandemic, Teixeira obtained MNPI from her laptop about possible upcoming mergers and acquisitions. Teixeira then allegedly used that MNPI to buy call options on certain companies prior to the public announcements of the deals, and he shared the MNPI with Meadow, who began to trade on it as well. Teixeira allegedly made just under $30,000 from the scheme, but Meadow allegedly made over $700,000 by recommending the trades to his customers and receiving commissions.
  • February 2024. In early 2024, in a similar case, the SEC brought insider trading charges against Tyler Loudon in connection with his alleged misappropriation of MNPI about an upcoming acquisition of BP p.l.c. (BP). Press Release, SEC, SEC Charges Husband of Energy Company Manager with Insider Trading, No. 2024-24 (Feb. 22, 2024). Loudon's wife, a manager of mergers and acquisitions at BP, worked on the company's planned acquisition of TravelCenters of America Inc. (TA). The SEC alleges that Loudon overheard his wife's phone calls about the planned Page 2 of 3 Insider Trading and Off-Channel Communications: Remote and Hybrid Work Environment Checklist deal and then, unbeknownst to his wife, used that information to purchase shares of TA's stock before the public announcement of the merger. The alleged scheme resulted in $1.76 million in illegal trading profits for Loudon.

Remote Work Environments Risks: Recordkeeping and Off-Channel Communications

The SEC has also cracked down on another byproduct of remote work: the use of off-channel communications in violation of federal securities laws' recordkeeping provisions. The past year has seen a wave of enforcement actions against broker-dealers and investment advisers that failed to prevent or preserve work-related, off-channel communications by their employees.

Conclusions and Risk Mitigation Guidance

As set forth above, in its early pandemic guidance, the SEC warned that telework may pose increased risks to market integrity and the Commission forecasted its intent to vigilantly enforce federal securities laws in an effort to protect market integrity. Stephanie Avakian and Steven Peikin, Co-Directors, Div. of Enf't, U.S. Secs. and Exch. Comm'n, Statement Regarding Market Integrity (Mar. 23, 2020). In the past few years, the SEC has demonstrated its commitment to those issues via its aggressive enforcement of insider trading and recordkeeping laws. Entities should heed the SEC's urging to "be mindful of their established disclosure controls and procedures, insider trading prohibitions, codes of ethics, and Regulation FD and selective disclosure prohibitions."

Broker-dealers and investment advisers should be especially vigilant about compliance risks. In August 2020, the SEC's Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (OCIE) published a risk alert about pandemic-related considerations specifically for those types of entities. The alert outlines certain categories of risk mitigation recommendations, including suggestions for the "supervision of personnel" and the "protection of investor and other sensitive information." Select COVID-19 Compliance Risks and Considerations for Broker-Dealers and Investment Advisers, Risk Alert, SEC, Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations (Aug. 12, 2020). To ensure the proper supervision of firm personnel, OCIE encouraged firms to modify their policies, procedures, and practices to address:

  • The potential lack of oversight from supervisors when employees work remotely
  • The potential that communications will occur between employees using personal devices from remote locations, rather than using the systems of the firm –and
  • Reviews of remote trading, particularly regading "high volume investments"

To ensure the protection of sensitive information, OCIE recommended that firms devote attention to the specific vulnerabilities—cybersecurity-related and otherwise—created by remote work. OCIE encouraged firms to: Page 3 of 3 Insider Trading and Off-Channel Communications: Remote and Hybrid Work Environment Checklist

  • Enhance the security of their systems, including "identity protection practices" and the use of multifactor identification
  • Provide additional cybersecurity training regarding, among other things, phishing, password-protection, and cyberattacks –and
  • Encrypt data and communications stored on both firm-owned and personal devices

In light of this guidance, and the wave of enforcement actions that have occurred since, entities should prioritize the mitigation of risk regarding MNPI and off-channel communications by reviewing and regularly assessing their policies, procedures, and compliance trainings to ensure that they reflect the SEC's recommendations, regularly consider how MNPI is defined in light of the information to which its employees have access, and sufficiently address the unique risks posed by now seemingly permanent remote work environments.

Related Content

Practice Notes

Templates

Articles

Originally published in LexisNexis July 12, 2024.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More