Firm Settles FINRA Charges For Supervisory Failures On Variable Annuity Transactions

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to properly supervise certain types of variable annuity transactions and to monitor variable annuity exchanges.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to properly supervise certain types of variable annuity transactions and to monitor variable annuity exchanges.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver, and Consent, FINRA stated that the firm's reviewing principals could not reasonably determine the suitability of a variable annuity exchange because the firm did not analyze material information regarding (i) living benefit riders and (ii) buffer annuities. Specifically, FINRA found that the firm did not:

  • include on its disclosure forms a comparison of the existing annuity's living benefit value and the potential loss of value due to the exchange;
  • require its registered representatives to enter the living benefit value into the firm's electronic system; and
  • ensure that customers were informed of key features of the buffer annuity.

Additionally, FINRA found that the firm could not determine which exchanges required further review because (i) its monthly reports did not monitor rates of exchanges, (ii) the firm did not designate an individual responsible for surveilling exchanges and (iii) the firm did not provide guidance for determining "excessive" rates of exchanges.

As a result, the firm violated FINRA Rules 3110(a) and (b) ("Supervision"), 2330(c) and (d) ("Members' Responsibilities Regarding Deferred Variable Annuities") and 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to (i) a censure and (ii) a $100,000 fine.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: UnionBanc Investment Services, LLC

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More