ARTICLE
25 January 2021

Broker-Dealer Settles FINRA Charges For Supervisory Failures Over RMBS Transactions

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Broker-Dealer Settles FINRA Charges for Supervisory Failures over RMBS Transactions.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to adequately address red flags arising from residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS") transactions negotiated by one of the broker-dealer's associated persons.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA alleged that one of the broker-dealer's registered representatives made misleading statements to counterparties regarding available bid or offer prices in relation to the sale and purchase of 11 RMBS. FINRA also stated that the broker-dealer's written supervisory procedures ("WSPs") mandated the review of nine of the RMBS transactions, as they surpassed the markup margin for RMBS. FINRA found that the broker-dealer failed to conduct further investigation upon learning that, in several of the flagged transactions:

  • the same registered representative was on both sides of such transactions;
  • the representative negotiated directly with counterparties in order to obtain the greatest spreads for the broker-dealer;
  • only the representative had firsthand access to the bids or offer prices sent by the counterparties; and
  • highly variant profits were generated in "a highly illiquid and opaque market."

As a result, FINRA found that the broker-dealer did not reasonably review the transactions or supervise the registered representative and determined that the broker-dealer violated NASD Rule 3010 and FINRA Rule 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade").

To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to a censure and a $250,000 fine.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: Amherst Pierpont Securities LLC

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More