ARTICLE
13 August 2019

Market Participants Split On Trigger Events For IBOR Cessation

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
ISDA said that preliminary results of a consultation show no consensus on whether contemplated fallback amendments to certain floating rate options that reference an IBOR should include a fallback trigger.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

ISDA released the preliminary results of its consultation concerning pre-cessation issues for certain interbank offered rates ("IBORs") titled "Consultation on Pre-Cessation Issues for LIBOR and Certain Other Interbank Offered Rates (IBORs)" (the "Pre-cessation Consultation").

ISDA said that preliminary results of a consultation show no consensus on whether contemplated fallback amendments to certain floating rate options that reference an IBOR should include a fallback trigger.

In its May 2019 Pre-cessation Consultation, ISDA requested feedback on whether contemplated fallback amendments to certain floating rate options that reference an IBOR (the "IBOR Amendments") should include a fallback trigger. As previously covered, ISDA requested the feedback after a public statement by the regulatory supervisor for the administrator of an IBOR announced that such IBOR is no longer representative of the related underlying market (a "Pre-cessation trigger" or "PCT").

ISDA said that respondents to the Pre-cessation Consultation expressed a wide variety of views and opinions regarding whether and how to implement PCTs. No opinion or view was expressed by a majority of the respondents. According to ISDA, the responses were split between those who:

  • support including a PCT as a fallback trigger in the IBOR amendments without any optionality;
  • support including a PCT as a fallback trigger in the IBOR amendments subject to certain qualifications or with optionality (e.g., providing market participants the flexibility to not apply PCTs to certain transactions); or
  • do not support including a PCT as a fallback trigger in the IBOR amendments.

In September 2019, ISDA expects to publish an anonymized and aggregated summary of the feedback to the Pre-cessation Consultation. ISDA hopes to further consult on a proposed documentation solution that provides for the efficient incorporation of PCTs, while mitigating concerns and avoiding unnecessary complications and optionality that could jeopardize broad market adoption of the IBOR Amendments.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More