ARTICLE
12 October 2021

Swap Dealer Settles CFTC Charges For Inaccurate Daily Large Trader Reports

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A swap dealer ("SD") settled CFTC charges for omitting certain information on its daily large trader reports ("LTRs") and Forms 102S, and submitted inaccurate commodity reference price and volume values.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A swap dealer ("SD") settled CFTC charges for omitting certain information on its daily large trader reports ("LTRs") and Forms 102S, and submitted inaccurate commodity reference price and volume values.

In the Order, the CFTC found that the SD did not include certain new swaps on its Part 20 submissions for a period after it switched from one swap data repository to another. In addition, the CFTC found that as a result of an error in its reporting code, the SD submitted LTRs that contained inaccurate commodity reference price and volume values. Further, the CFTC found that the SD conducted limited reviews of its submissions and did not have in place "robust internal processes" to determine the accuracy or completeness of Part 20 reports.

The CFTC determined that the SD violated Section 4s(f) ("Reporting and recordkeeping") and 4s(h)(1)(B) ("Business conduct standards") of the CEA and CFTC Rules 20.4 ("Reporting entities"), 20.5 ("Series S filings"), 20.7 ("Form and manner of reporting and submitting information or filings") and 23.602 ("Diligent supervision").

To settle the charges, the SD agreed to (i) cease and desist from future violations, (ii) pay a $750,000 civil monetary penalty and (iii) compliance undertakings.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More