A Pragmatic Approach To Sanctions-Related Administrations

KM
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

Contributor

Katten is a firm of first choice for clients seeking sophisticated, high-value legal services globally. Our nationally and internationally recognized practices include corporate, financial markets and funds, insolvency and restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, real estate, structured finance and securitization, transactional tax planning, private credit and private wealth.
London partners Prav Reddy and Sonya Van de Graaff, Insolvency and Restructuring, authored an article for Financial Regulation International on the England and Wales High Court's recent judgment...
UK Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

London partners Prav Reddy and Sonya Van de Graaff, Insolvency and Restructuring, authored an article for Financial Regulation International on the England and Wales High Court's recent judgment regarding the application by Sova Capital Ltd to enter a "credit bid" transaction, which is not legislated for in the UK, representing "the first unsecured credit bid to be approved by an English court."

The joint special administrators applied to the court for directions to enter into two transactions with one of their largest unsecured creditors, Dominanta, in the wake of sanctions imposed by the US, UK and EU member states following Russia's invasion of Ukraine as well as Russian countermeasures that "rendered Sova cash flow insolvent and 'effectively trapped' its Russian securities." Prav and Sonya explained that these transactions would involve Dominanta waiving its £223 million claim against Sova in exchange for a portfolio of Russian securities.

However, the pari passu principle, "which requires that distribution among unsecured creditors of assets available in an insolvent estate should be equal," was raised in opposition by a competing unsecured creditor that wished to purchase those same Russian securities for £125 million in cash and a waiver of its own £19.9 million claim. The court ultimately held that this principle did not apply "as the proposed transaction was considered to be a sale rather than a distribution to creditors," and that there was no "realistic risk" the transactions would breach applicable sanctions laws.

Prav and Sonya noted that the decision "demonstrates that the courts are taking a pragmatic approach to complex sanctions-related administrations" and "identifies a novel solution for insolvency practitioners to maximize value for the benefit of creditors as an alternative to a sale to a third party."

"A Pragmatic Approach to Sanctions-Related Administrations" *Financial Regulation International, June 9, 2023

*Subscription may be required for article access.

Note: This article was first published as an advisory on March 27, 2023.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More