ARTICLE
13 February 2023

How To Challenge Unfair Commercial Practices By Competitors

NG
Novagraaf Group

Contributor

Novagraaf has been helping iconic brands and innovative organisations drive competitive advantage through intellectual property (IP) for more than 130 years. One of Europe’s leading IP consulting groups, Novagraaf specialises in the protection and global management of IP rights, including trademarks, patents, designs, domain names and copyright. Part of the Questel group, Novagraaf has 18 offices worldwide and a network of more than 330 IP attorneys and support specialists.
Unfair commercial practices not only prevent consumers from making informed decisions; they also impact the bottom line and reputation of the impacted companies. Noa Rubingh sets out how to take action.
European Union Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Unfair commercial practices not only prevent consumers from making informed decisions; they also impact the bottom line and reputation of the impacted companies. Noa Rubingh sets out how to take action.

While legal protection against unfair commercial practices seems primarily aimed at safeguarding consumers, companies can also rely on these provisions to challenge unfair commercial practices by competitors. In the EU, this was established in the RLvS v Stuttgarter Wochenblatt judgement handed down by the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) in 2013:

"It is common ground that RLvS did not act in the name of or on behalf of those undertakings within the meaning of Article 2(b) of Directive 2005/29 [The European Unfair Commercial Practices Directive]. In such a scenario, and given its ratione personae scope, Directive 2005/29 is indeed intended to protect consumers of products and services of those same undertakings and their legitimate competitors."

When is a commercial practice by a competitor considered unfair?

However, a mere finding that unfair commercial practices have taken place is insufficient to invoke the Directive's provisions. The (derivative) aim of the Directive is to protect companies from harming their economic interests (clause 6), thus ensuring fair competition (clause 8).

Instead, the company's competitive position must have been harmed by the unfair commercial practices for the protection granted by the Directive to be invoked. The threat of harm, as in tort, is sufficient for this purpose. For example, a single misleading advertisement is considered sufficient to affect the company's competitive position.

In addition, the term 'competitor' is interpreted broadly in the Directive. Even if the claimant company is not a competitor in the narrow sense – for example, it does not offer the same or similar products or services – its competitive position may still be harmed by an unfair business-to-consumer (B2C) practice.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More