President Trump Restructures ALJ Hiring Process

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order ("E.O.") exempting administrative law judges ("ALJs") from Civil Service competitive hiring rules and examinations.
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order ("E.O.") exempting administrative law judges ("ALJs") from Civil Service competitive hiring rules and examinations. According to the White House, this E.O. provides agency heads with broader hiring authority and "reduces legal uncertainty" following the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Lucia v. SEC which held that the SEC practice of hiring ALJs was unconstitutional.

Under the E.O., agency heads will be able to hire ALJs directly without their undergoing the Office of Personnel Management selection process. Accordingly, agency heads will be able to hire ALJs based on less restrictive requirements similar to those for hiring a federal attorney. The E.O. further provides that the Civil Service Rules and Regulations no longer apply to the removal of ALJs.

Commentary / Kyle DeYoung

The E.O. makes important changes to the process for appointing ALJs. Most significantly, the E.O. puts the authority to hire – and potentially fire – ALJs directly in the hands of agency heads who are political appointees with mostly unfettered discretion. These changes will give agencies more flexibility in selecting ALJs and will likely make ALJs more accountable to the heads of their agencies. At the same time, these changes raise concerns about political influence on ALJs. It remains to be seen if ALJs will maintain their decision independence under the new procedures.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More