ARTICLE
8 January 2016

FLH Attorneys Prevail In An Appeal For A Vietnam-War Veteran

HP
Haug Partners

Contributor

Haug Partners is a full-service law firm that provides integrated multidisciplinary legal services for technology companies. Through relationships with firms in Germany, China, Japan, and other key international markets, Haug Partners has the resources, technical expertise, legal acumen, and business judgment to consistently deliver optimal outcomes for clients.
On December 28, 2015, the Court of Appeals for Veteran's Claims ("CAVC") remanded several issues in an appeal by Laurence Wilkins from a decision by the Board of Veterans' Appeals...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On December 28, 2015, the Court of Appeals for Veteran's Claims ("CAVC") remanded several issues in an appeal by Laurence Wilkins from a decision by the Board of Veterans' Appeals ("Board") denying certain disability benefits.

Mr. Wilkins served in the United States Marine Corps and fought in the Vietnam war, where, among other things, he rescued fellow marines from downed, burning aircraft.

Mr. Wilkins's combat experiences caused him to suffer from post-traumatic stress disorder, which in turn caused him to suffer from erectile dysfunction.  The Board denied disability benefits for Mr. Wilkins's ED.

On appeal, the CAVC agreed with arguments developed by FLH attorneys and remanded the case.  Among other things, the court decided that the Board failed to adequately explain the reasons and bases for its decision denying disability benefits.

Further, the CAVC concluded that the Board incorrectly determined that Mr. Wilkins could not receive special monthly compensation for loss of use of a creative organ in addition to disability benefits for ED.  The court also concluded that the Board erroneously overlooked evidence presented by Mr. Wilkins showing that certain disability benefits should have started earlier than the starting date specified by the Board.

Bryan Braunel prepared the briefs for Mr. Wilkins's appeal, and Ying-Zi Yang and Janice Ye supported him with legal research.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More