"Chevron Is Overruled."

This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo et al., 603 U.S. ___ (2024), overruling the decades-old doctrine of deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions established in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) as inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act...
United States Litigation, Mediation & Arbitration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This morning, the United States Supreme Court issued its opinion in Loper Bright Enterprises et al. v. Raimondo et al., 603 U.S. ___ (2024), overruling the decades-old doctrine of deference to agency interpretations of ambiguous statutory provisions established in Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v. NRDC, 467 U.S. 837 (1984) as inconsistent with the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Going forward, courts "need not and under the APA may not defer to an agency interpretation of the law simply because a statute is ambiguous." Loper Bright, Slip Op., p. 35. This opinion will significantly impact judicial review of Interior Department decisions covering a wide array of issues going forward (e.g., lease sales challenges, royalty disputes, etc.).

Click here to read The Supreme Court's opinion.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More