ARTICLE
27 October 2022

Important Changes In USPTO Trademark Practices To Take Effect On Dec. 3, 2022

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
As part of the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 (reported in the IP Intelligence Blog on Dec. 23, 2021), beginning on Dec. 3, trademark applicants will have three months...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

As part of the Trademark Modernization Act of 2020 (reported in the IP Intelligence Blog on Dec. 23, 2021), beginning on Dec. 3, trademark applicants will have three months (with a possible three-month extension) to respond to office actions issued during the examination of trademark applications at the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The same change will go into effect next year (on Oct. 7, 2023) for post-registration office actions.

Since the passage of the Lanham Act in 1946, applicants have always had six months to file their response to office actions. However, perhaps because faster communications are now possible, it is the intention of the USPTO that shortening the time frame to three months will do the following:

  • Decrease the time it takes to get and maintain a registration.
  • Provide the flexibility to request additional time (for a fee) to respond to more complex office actions. The government filing fee to request an additional three months is $125 (electronic filing) or $225 (paper filing).

There has never been a requirement for trademark applicants to wait the full six months to file a response to an outstanding office action, nor will there be a requirement for applicants to wait three months to file. However, there may be strategic reasons for using all the available time to respond, whether it be three or six months.

If an applicant does choose to file for an additional three months, the request can only be made if the applicant has not already filed a response. The request must then be made on or before the three-month deadline. If the request is granted, the response must be filed on or within six months of the "issue date" of the office action.

The new response period applies to applications filed under most application filing bases, including those filed under Lanham Act Sections 1(a) (use-based), 1(b) (intent-to-use) and 44 (foreign). It does not apply, however, to applications filed under the Madrid Protocol (Section 66(a)). Those applications will continue to have a six-month response period.

Finally, an application will be abandoned if the response to the office action isn't timely filed on or within either the three-month deadline or the later requested six-month deadline.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More