ARTICLE
16 August 2009

IRS Extends Deadline For FBAR Amnesty Program For Certain Filers And May Be Reconsidering FBAR Filing Requirement In Certain Circumstances

MF
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Contributor

Known for providing cutting-edge legal advice on matters that are redefining industries, Morrison & Foerster has 17 offices located in the United States, Asia, and Europe. Our clients include Fortune 100 companies, leading tech and life sciences companies, and some of the largest financial institutions. We also represent investment funds and startups.
Today, the IRS announced an extension to June 30, 2010 for certain filers who are eligible under the March 23, 2009 voluntary disclosure program for those who failed to disclose their foreign financial accounts for the past six years.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Today, the IRS announced an extension to June 30, 2010 for certain filers who are eligible under the March 23, 2009 voluntary disclosure program for those who failed to disclose their foreign financial accounts for the past six years. The IRS explained that it needed more time to provide timely guidance and provide administrative relief for (i) persons with signature authority over, but no financial interest in, a foreign financial account, and (ii) persons with a financial interest in, or signature authority over, a foreign commingled fund. The notice can be accessed through this link: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-drop/n-09-62.pdf.

The IRS also requested public comments on the following issues:

  • Whether the disclosure by an owner of a financial account should be sufficient without the additional filing by persons with signature authority over such account. In other words, the IRS is asking whether to drop the filing requirement for persons who only have signature or other authority over the account. This would be a significant change to current filing requirements.
  • In what circumstances the exception from FBAR filing currently available for officers and employees of banks and certain publicly-traded domestic companies might be expanded to apply to all officers and employees with only signature authority over, and no financial interest in, an employer's foreign financial account.
  • When should an interest in a foreign entity (e.g., a corporation, partnership, trust, or estate) be subject to FBAR reporting, for example, whether PFIC principles should apply to determine when an interest in a foreign entity should be subject to FBAR reporting.
  • Whether a U.S. person should be relieved from an FBAR filing requirement with respect to a foreign commingled fund in other circumstances, such as when filing would be duplicative of other reporting.

Absent in the solicitation for comments was a clear request on the question whether hedge funds are commingled funds. We previously reported on the IRS's informal statements regarding treatment of foreign hedge funds as financial accounts for purposes of FBAR reporting. http://www.mofo.com/news/updates/files/15729.html. These statements surprised practitioners and taxpayers alike and generated a significant amount of activity in the very month the 2008 FBAR was due. Comments on this question were submitted to the IRS in the few weeks leading up to June 30, 2009 deadline.

Because of the generality of this update, the information provided herein may not be applicable in all situations and should not be acted upon without specific legal advice based on particular situations.

© Morrison & Foerster LLP. All rights reserved

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More