ARTICLE
2 November 2016

IRS Revenue Procedure Confirms IRS Will Respect QTIP Elections When Portability Elections Also Made

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The IRS resolved an important issue when it issued Revenue Procedure 2016-49, effective September 27, 2016, clarifying that the IRS would not disregard QTIP elections for estates that also made a portability election.
United States Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The IRS resolved an important issue when it issued Revenue Procedure 2016-49, effective September 27, 2016, clarifying that the IRS would not disregard qualified terminable interest property (QTIP) elections for estates that also made a portability election.

Uncertainty over when QTIP elections would be respected arose after the IRS stated in a 2001 Revenue Procedure that unnecessary QTIP elections could be disregarded as null for federal gift, estate and GST tax purposes. Under the 2001 Revenue Procedure, a QTIP election could be deemed unnecessary and ignored if the election was not needed to reduce the estate tax value to zero. For example, where a decedent's estate was under the applicable exclusion amount, the IRS could disregard a QTIP election made by the estate's executor or personal representative solely for the purpose of preserving the deceased spouse's unused exclusion amount under the portability rules.

With Revenue Procedure 2016-49, the IRS put doubts to rest by clarifying that it will respect QTIP elections made by estates whose executors or personal representatives properly made a portability election, regardless of the estate tax value before the QTIP election was made. Revenue Procedure 2016-49 also confirms much of the 2001 Revenue Procedure by detailing the requirements for when a QTIP election will be disregarded, such as when an estate has not made a portability election and the estate tax would be zero without the QTIP election.

It appears that portability is here to stay, and Revenue Procedure 2016-49 should provide relief and clarity to those who plan to utilize both QTIP and portability elections.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More