ARTICLE
3 February 2020

New Guidance On CFC Downward Attribution Rules

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Under the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules of the tax code, taxpayers may be subject to adverse tax consequences, including "phantom income" inclusions, if they are 10% United States shareholders in a CFC.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Under the controlled foreign corporation (CFC) rules of the tax code, taxpayers may be subject to adverse tax consequences, including "phantom income" inclusions, if they are 10% United States shareholders in a CFC. Very generally, a CFC is any foreign corporation more than 50% of whose voting power or value is directly, indirectly, or constructively owned by 10% United States shareholders.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act expanded constructive ownership to include downward attribution, so that a subsidiary now is deemed to own all of the stock owned by any 50% shareholder. As a result of this expansion, if (for example) a foreign parent owns a U.S. subsidiary and a foreign subsidiary, the U.S. subsidiary is deemed to own all of the stock of the foreign subsidiary, so that the foreign subsidiary is treated as a CFC, which could have adverse tax consequences for any 10% United States shareholders of the parent.

On October 1, 2019, Treasury and the IRS issued a revenue procedure and proposed regulations that would address the expansion of constructive ownership. Despite legislative history suggesting that this expansion was intended to have a more limited effect than what the tax code now literally provides, the new guidance provides relief only from certain reporting requirements and does not protect 10% United States shareholders from phantom income inclusions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More