ARTICLE
27 February 2017

Office Of Compliance Inspections And Examinations Issues Risk Alert On The Five Most Frequent Compliance Topics Identified In Examinations Of Investment Advisers

O
Orrick

Contributor

Orrick logo
Orrick is a global law firm focused on serving the technology & innovation, energy & infrastructure and finance sectors. Founded over 150 years ago, Orrick has offices in 25+ markets worldwide. Financial Times selected Orrick as the Most Innovative Law Firm in North America for three years in a row.
The five compliance topics addressed in this Risk Alert are deficiencies or weaknesses involving: (i) Rule 206(4)-7 (the Compliance Rule) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the Advisers Act);
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

By Edward Elsert

On February 7, 2017, the Office of Compliance Inspections and Examinations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (OCIE) published a Risk Alert listing of the five compliance topics most frequently identified in deficiency letters that were sent to SEC‑registered investment advisers ("Advisers") during the past two years. Within each of these topics, a few examples of typical deficiencies were discussed to highlight the risks and issues that examiners commonly identified.

The five compliance topics addressed in this Risk Alert are deficiencies or weaknesses involving: (i) Rule 206(4)-7 (the Compliance Rule) under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the Advisers Act); (ii) required regulatory filings; (iii) Rule 206(4)-2 under the Advisers Act (the Custody Rule); (iv) Rule 204A-1 under the Advisers Act (the Code of Ethics Rule); and (v) Rule 204-2 under the Advisers Act (the Books and Records Rule). The Staff emphasized that: "Advisers should review their compliance programs and practices in light of the topics noted in this Risk Alert."

Although the list of deficiencies and weaknesses was based upon examinations of SEC‑registered investment advisers, these findings also should be considered as regulatory guidance by "exempt reporting advisers," particularly those whose business is anticipated to grow beyond the scope of the exemption on which they are relying; for example, the failure to adopt and maintain a Code of Ethics (an obligation applicable to all investment advisers, whether or not registered), the failure to adopt compliance manuals that are reasonably tailored to the Adviser's business practices, the failure of Advisers to follow their compliance manual policies and procedures, and the failure of Advisers to maintain accurate books and records with regard to their investment adviser business, including typical accounting and other business records. Press Release.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More