ARTICLE
14 September 2016

SEC Settles Charges Against Two Investment Advisory Firms For Compliance Failures In Wrap Fee Programs

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The SEC settled charges against two investment advisory firms in conjunction with compliance failures within their wrap fee programs.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The SEC settled charges against two investment advisory firms in conjunction with compliance failures within their wrap fee programs.

The SEC investigations found that the firms:

  • failed to establish policies and procedures necessary to determine the amount of commissions their clients were being charged when sub-advisers "traded away" with a broker-dealer outside the wrap fee programs; and
  • failed to provide their respective financial advisors with critical information regarding the magnitude of the costs to clients. The advisers, in turn, failed to consider these commissions when determining whether sub-advisers or wrap fee programs were suitable for their clients. These failures left certain clients unaware they were paying additional costs beyond the single wrap fee they were paying for bundled investment services.

The SEC noted that its National Exam Program includes wrap fee programs among its annual examination priorities, particularly focusing on whether advisers are fulfilling their fiduciary and contractual obligations to clients and properly managing account aspects such as: disclosures, conflicts of interest, best execution and trading away from the sponsor broker-dealer.

The two firms agreed to pay fines of $600,000 and $250,000, respectively.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More