ARTICLE
21 February 2022

Firms Settle SEC Charges Alleging Failure To Meet Form CRS Obligations

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
Twelve financial firms, six broker-dealers and six investment advisers agreed to pay penalties ranging from $10,000 to $97,523 to settle SEC charges alleging that the firms failed to meet Form CRS obligations.
United States Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Twelve financial firms, six broker-dealers and six investment advisers agreed to pay penalties ranging from $10,000 to $97,523 to settle SEC charges alleging that the firms failed to meet Form CRS obligations. These Orders are the second batch of enforcement actions against brokers and advisers for failing to timely comply with Form CRS obligations.

SEC-registered broker-dealers and investment advisers were required to file the Form CRS with the Commission and post it to their website by June 30, 2020. In addition, all brokers and advisers were required to deliver their Forms CRS to new customers by June 30, 2020, and to existing customers by July 30, 2020. The SEC Orders stated that those 12 firms all failed to file and deliver client or customer relationship summaries to their retail investors by the required deadlines and, in some cases, failed to include all information necessary to satisfy Form CRS requirements. The investment advisers were found to have violated IAA Section 204  ("Reports by IAs") and Advisers Act Rule 204-1 ("Amendments to Form ADV") and Rule 204-5 ("Delivery of Form CRS"), and that the broker-dealers were found to have violated SEA Section 17(a)(1) ("Records and Reports") and Exchange Act Rule 17a-14 ("Form CRS, for preparation, filing and delivery of Form CRS").

In addition to agreeing to pay civil penalties, the firms agreed (i) to be censured and (ii) to cease and desist from violating the charged provisions.

Commentary Steven Lofchie

The firms were all charged with very straightforward violations, such as failure to file. None of the violations was based on the substance of the reports.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More