Discretionary Denial At The PTAB Based On Parallel Litigation

WG
Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C.

Contributor

Wolf, Greenfield & Sacks, P.C. logo
For nearly a century, Wolf Greenfield has helped clients protect their most valuable intellectual property. The firm offers a full range of IP services, including patent prosecution and litigation; post-grant proceedings, including IPRs; opinions and strategic counseling; licensing; intellectual property audits and due diligence; trademark and copyright prosecution and litigation; and other issues related to the commercialization of intellectual property.
Discretionary denial has been a hot topic at the PTAB. On Wednesday, February 24th, Wolf Greenfield hosted a webinar to discuss discretionary denial at the PTAB, and in particular, discretionary...
United States Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Discretionary denial has been a hot topic at the PTAB. On Wednesday, February 24th, Wolf Greenfield hosted a webinar to discuss discretionary denial at the PTAB, and in particular, discretionary denial based on parallel infringement litigation in district court or the ITC.

This webinar covered:

  • Where it started: An overview of the factors under the PTAB's Fintiv decision
  • Where we are now: How the PTAB has applied the Fintiv standard and how it has used precedential decisions to clarify those factors
  • Where we are going: How regulations, legal challenges, and the new administration may affect discretionary denial in the futur

To view the webinar replay, click here. For a copy of the slides that were presented at this webinar, click here.

The Post Grant Strategist

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More