ARTICLE
13 July 2026

FTC Seeks Comment On AI Policy Statement

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On July 1, the FTC announced a request for public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing the application of section 5 of the FTC Act to Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems.
United States Technology
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring and Cannabis & Hemp topic(s)

On July 1, the FTC announced a request for public comment on a proposed policy statement addressing the application of section 5 of the FTC Act to Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems. The proposed policy statement explains that AI companies may engage in deceptive practices if they make representations about an AI system’s accuracy, objectivity, or reliability while allegedly altering outputs in a manner inconsistent with those representations.

The proposed policy statement focuses on whether AI systems operate consistent with consumer expectations and representations made regarding their capabilities. According to the FTC, companies may create expectations that their AI systems are designed to provide outputs that accurately respond to user objectives, and that undisclosed changes affecting those outputs could raise concerns under Section 5. The policy statement noted that AI products and services remain subject to traditional consumer protection standards, including requirements that companies avoid misleading claims regarding the performance, effectiveness, and characteristics of AI tools. Companies can avoid potential violations by clearly disclosing when an AI system prioritizes objectives different from those users requested or would otherwise reasonably expect.

Putting It Into Practice: The proposed policy statement follows continued federal and state efforts to address the application of existing regulatory frameworks to AI technologies (previously discussed here and here). The FTC has also pursued enforcement actions against AI companies for allegedly deceptive practices, including claims regarding the accuracy and capabilities of AI products. Companies developing or deploying consumer-facing AI tools should review representations regarding AI capabilities, assess whether system functionality aligns with consumer-facing disclosures, and continue monitoring federal and state AI developments as regulators refine expectations for AI governance.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More