ARTICLE
2 October 2014

OIG Releases Advisory Opinion Concerning Preferred Hospital Networks

Earlier this month, certain preferred hospital arrangements received a "green light" from the Department of Health & Human Services’ Office of Inspector General.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Earlier this month, certain preferred hospital arrangements received a "green light" from the Department of Health & Human Services' Office of Inspector General (OIG). It issued an advisory opinion that, although very fact-sensitive, allowed for the use of a "preferred hospital" network as part of Medicare Supplemental Health Insurance (Medigap) policies.

The arrangement allowed for the requestor to indirectly contract with hospitals for discounts on otherwise-applicable Medicare inpatient deductibles for the requestor's policyholders. Additionally, the requestor was allowed to provide policyholders with a $100 premium credit off of the next renewal premium if the policyholders used a network hospital for an inpatient stay,

OIG's analysis first compared the arrangement to the anti-kickback statute's prohibited remuneration and, more specifically, certain "safe harbor" provisions (42 C.F.R. § 1001.952(k) and (l)). Although OIG found that the arrangement did not qualify for safe harbor protection, OIG nevertheless concluded that – in combination with Medigap coverage – the discounts offered on inpatient deductibles and the premium credits presented a sufficiently low risk of fraud or abuse under the anti-kickback statute. It gave specific reasons behind this conclusion:

  • neither the discounts nor the premium credits would increase or affect per-service Medicare payments
  • the arrangement would be unlikely to increase utilization
  • the arrangement should not unfairly affect competition among hospitals,
  • the arrangement would be unlikely to affect professional medical judgment
  • the arrangement would be transparent

Finally, OIG examined the premium credit in the context of a prohibition (found in the civil penalty law) on inducements to beneficiaries. It allowed the arrangement because there is an exception for differentials in coinsurance and deductible amounts, as part of a benefit plan design, when the differentials are properly disclosed to affected parties and meet other requirements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More