There Is No Such Thing As A "Free" Urine Test

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
The Middle District of Florida considered whether the provision of free point-of-care testing cups to doctors constitutes remuneration under the Stark Law.
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On May 5, 2014, in Ameritox, Ltd. v. Millennium Labs., Inc., [No. 8:11-cv-775-T-24-TBM], 2014 WL 1779267 (M.D. Fla. May 5, 2014), the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida granted in part and denied in part a motion for partial summary judgment as to the issue of whether the provision of free point-of-care (POC) testing cups to doctors constitutes remuneration under the Stark Law and anti-kickback statute (AKS).

The court, in granting the motion, determined that the free POC testing cups constituted remuneration to the doctors under the Stark Law and AKS when the POC testing cups were used to perform free preliminary test results that the doctors could not have obtained without purchasing the POC testing cups. The court rejected the argument that the free POC testing cups met an exception under the Stark Law. The court explained in such situation, the doctors obtained a preliminary test result without having to pay for the POC testing cups and without giving up the opportunity to bill for the POC testing by billing for a chemical analyzer test of the same specimen. The doctors, thus, were receiving a valuable benefit in the form of the free preliminary test results.

The court, in denying the motion, concluded that whether the provision of free POC testing cups constituted remuneration under the Stark Law and AKS to doctors who could bill for the POC testing using the free POC testing cups, but agreed to forego the opportunity to bill for it, was a genuine issue of material fact for the jury to determine. The court explained in such situation, it appears that the doctors were giving up the ability to bill for POC testing, which was approximately a net of $15 per specimen.

The specific facts of the arrangement determine whether the provision of free POC testing cups constitutes remuneration under the Stark Law and AKS. Therefore, it is important to analyze the details of your particular arrangement when free services or items are involved in order to determine whether it complies with the Stark Law and AKS.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More