FAQs Address ACA Preventive Care Questions Post-Braidwood

SS
Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Contributor

With more than 900 lawyers across 18 offices, Seyfarth Shaw LLP provides advisory, litigation, and transactional legal services to clients worldwide. Our high-caliber legal representation and advanced delivery capabilities allow us to take on our clients’ unique challenges and opportunities-no matter the scale or complexity. Whether navigating complex litigation, negotiating transformational deals, or advising on cross-border projects, our attorneys achieve exceptional legal outcomes. Our drive for excellence leads us to seek out better ways to work with our clients and each other. We have been first-to-market on many legal service delivery innovations-and we continue to break new ground with our clients every day. This long history of excellence and innovation has created a culture with a sense of purpose and belonging for all. In turn, our culture drives our commitment to the growth of our clients, the diversity of our people, and the resilience of our workforce.
The Tri-Agencies issued Frequently Asked Questions addressing the impact of the Braidwood decision on the ACA's preventive care mandate, including guidance on certain preventive care services...
United States Food, Drugs, Healthcare, Life Sciences
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Seyfarth Synopsis: The Tri-Agencies issued Frequently Asked Questions addressing the impact of the Braidwood decision on the ACA's preventive care mandate, including guidance on certain preventive care services that must continue to be covered under the ACA and how the ruling impacts first dollar coverage under high deductible health plans.

On April 13, 2023, the Department of Labor, Department of Health and Human Services, and the Treasury (the "Agencies") issued frequently asked questions ("FAQs") addressing implementation of the ACA preventive care mandate in the wake of Braidwood Management v. Becerra, a recent Texas federal district court decision that voided the ACA requirement for health plans to cover preventive care items and services (without cost sharing) recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force ("USPSTF") effective as of March 23, 2010. Importantly, the Agencies confirmed:

  1. Braidwood vacated any and all prior actions (and enjoined all future actions) taken by the Agencies to implement and enforce preventive care coverage requirements in response to an "A" or "B" rating recommendation by the USPSTF on or after March 23, 2010.
  2. Plans and issuers must continue to cover, without cost sharing, items and services with an "A" or "B" rating recommended by the USPSTF before March 23, 2010. The Agencies plan to issue additional guidance relating to any recommendations issued by the USPSTF prior to March 23, 2010, but subsequently revised after March 23, 2010. Plans and issuers are strongly encouraged, but not required, to continue to cover preventive care with an "A" or "B" rating recommended by the USPSTF after March 23, 2010.
  3. Plans and issuers must continue to cover, without cost sharing, preventive care items and services recommended by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (e.g., common vaccinations) and the Health Resources and Services Administration (e.g., vision screening, well-baby visits, mammograms, etc.), even if those same preventive care items and services were recommended with an "A" or "B" rating by the USPSTF.
  4. High deductible health plans may continue to provide coverage for preventive care items and services with an "A" or "B" rating recommended by the USPSTF before individuals satisfy the minimum annual deductible required under Internal Revenue Code Section 223.

Plans that make changes to coverage must comply with applicable notice requirements under the ACA and ERISA. The Agencies intend to issue additional guidance on the ACA preventive care mandate specifically relating to plans and issuers. For more detail on the Braidwood case, please see our prior blog post here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More