ARTICLE
27 January 2015

Limiting Ability Of OSHA To Modify Civil Penalties For Abatement Of Workplace Safety Violations

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
Assembly Bill 1634 permits the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health to modify civil penalties for abatement or grant an employer credit for abatement...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

With regard to serious safety violations, Assembly Bill 1634 permits the California Division of Occupational Safety and Health to modify civil penalties for abatement or grant an employer credit for abatement only if the employer (1) has abated the violation at the time of initial inspection; (2) has abated the violation at the time of a subsequent inspection prior to issuance of a citation; or (3) has submitted a signed statement under penalty of perjury with supporting evidence within 10 working days after the end of the abatement period.

Whenever a serious violation is not abated at the time of the initial or subsequent inspection, the division will require the employer to submit a signed statement under penalty of perjury, with supporting evidence where necessary, to prove abatement that the employer has complied with the abatement terms within the abatement period.

The filing of a petition for, or the pendency of, reconsideration of a final order or decision involving a citation classified as serious, repeat serious, or willful serious will not stay or suspend the abatement requirements unless the employer demonstrates by a preponderance of the evidence that a stay or suspension of abatement will not adversely affect the health and safety of employees.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More