Last week, Proskauer — along with co-counsel Democracy Forward, and the Catholic Legal Immigration Network, Inc. — filed a complaint on behalf of seven asylum seekers, their minor children and the legal services organization RAICES in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claiming that several current immigration directives impede access to counsel for asylum seekers fleeing persecution.
A credible fear interview is the first critical step for immigrants claiming asylum who have been placed in expedited removal proceedings. Accordingly, an asylum seeker's case for refuge in the United States turns on the effective presentation of their asylum claim at this important interview.
The asylum directives challenged in this lawsuit impact procedures designed to ensure that asylum seekers understand their rights and have the opportunity to adequately consult with counsel prior to their credible fear interview. Specifically, the directives:
- Significantly reduce the time asylum seekers have to consult a lawyer and prepare evidence to substantiate their fear of persecution.
- Prohibit asylum seekers from obtaining a continuance except in extraordinary circumstances. Specifically, continuances are no longer granted when additional time is needed to prepare for the interview or overcome language barriers.
The directives were first implemented at the South Texas Family Residential Center in Dilley, Texas, and subsequently at the Karnes County Residential Center in Karnes City, Texas. Both are family detention centers housing women and children primarily from El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras, who have experienced severe forms of violence and trauma.
Pro Bono For Immigrant Families: Protecting Access To Counsel
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.