ARTICLE
14 February 2017

Appellate Court Rejects Effort To Reinstate Travel Ban

M
Mintz

Contributor

Mintz is a general practice, full-service Am Law 100 law firm with more than 600 attorneys. We are headquartered in Boston and have additional US offices in Los Angeles, Miami, New York City, San Diego, San Francisco, and Washington, DC, as well as an office in Toronto, Canada.
On February 9, 2017, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously against the Government's emergency motion to stay the District Court's Temporary Restraining Order. . .
United States Immigration
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On February 9, 2017, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled unanimously against the Government's emergency motion to stay the District Court's Temporary Restraining Order (the "TRO") halting the implementation of major portions of President Trump's January 27th Executive Order. ( See our previous alerts on the order here, or click here to view a video featuring Susan Cohen, Chair of Mintz Levin's Immigration Practice.) Therefore, the TRO remains in effect and travel to the U.S. by individuals from the seven designated countries is governed by the same laws as existing before the Executive Order.

To read the full alert, click here.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More