ARTICLE
5 September 2024

FTC's Ban On Noncompete Agreements Is Blocked

FL
Foley & Lardner

Contributor

Foley & Lardner LLP looks beyond the law to focus on the constantly evolving demands facing our clients and their industries. With over 1,100 lawyers in 24 offices across the United States, Mexico, Europe and Asia, Foley approaches client service by first understanding our clients’ priorities, objectives and challenges. We work hard to understand our clients’ issues and forge long-term relationships with them to help achieve successful outcomes and solve their legal issues through practical business advice and cutting-edge legal insight. Our clients view us as trusted business advisors because we understand that great legal service is only valuable if it is relevant, practical and beneficial to their businesses.
The Federal Trade Commission's efforts to ban noncompete agreements suffered a serious blow when a federal judge in Texas issued a nationwide injunction blocking the ban's enforcement. Implementation of the ban could disrupt the delicate balance within the franchising industry.
United States Texas Corporate/Commercial Law
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Federal Trade Commission's efforts to ban noncompete agreements suffered a serious blow when a federal judge in Texas issued a nationwide injunction blocking the ban's enforcement. Implementation of the ban could disrupt the delicate balance within the franchising industry. Franchise agreements often rely on noncompete clauses to safeguard business models, maintain brand consistency, and protect intellectual property. Without these protections, franchisors might face increased risks of competition from former franchisees, potentially diluting the brand's value and undermining the entire franchise system.

On August 20, 2024, the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas issued an order setting aside the FTC's ban on employee noncompetes (the "Noncompete Rule") on a nationwide basis. The court held the Noncompete Rule was improperly overbroad and in excess of the agency's statutory authority.

Earlier this summer, another federal court in Pennsylvania sided with the FTC, finding the Noncompete Rule to be a valid exercise of the FTC's authority. Most recently, on August 14, 2024, the Middle District of Florida sided with the Texas court and similarly limited its order blocking the Noncompete Rule to only the specific plaintiff in the case. These inconsistent rulings left employers in a state of complete uncertainty, not knowing whether their noncompete agreements were enforceable or not.

Now, based on the Texas court's final order concluding that the Noncompete Rule is "unreasonably overbroad and without reasonable explanation," employers have some certainty for the foreseeable future. They are no longer required to notify current and former employees that their noncompetes are unenforceable—a deadline that was otherwise just a few weeks away.

The litigation over the Noncompete Rule will likely continue. The FTC will almost certainly appeal the ruling to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. For the foreseeable future, however, franchise systems should maintain their noncompete agreements in accordance with applicable state laws.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More