ARTICLE
27 December 2019

Broker Dealer Settles FINRA Charges For Supervisory Failures Over Best Execution

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to supervise the executing broker-dealers to which it sent orders to determine that they provided best...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for failing to supervise the executing broker-dealers to which it sent orders to determine that they provided best execution, as required FINRA Rule 5310 ("Best Execution and Interpositioning") for the broker-dealer's customers.

According to the Letter of Acceptance, Robinhood Financial, LLC ("Robinhood") promised its customers commission-free trade execution. Robinhood received payment for order flow from the various firms to which it sent trades for execution. FINRA alleged that Robinhood failed to supervise adequately those firms to ensure they were actually providing quality executions for Robinhood's customers.

To settle the charges, Robinhood agreed to (i) a censure, (ii) a $1,250,000 fine and (iii) hire an independent consultant to conduct a review of the firm's supervisory systems.

Commentary

Conor Almquist

While receipt of payment for order flow is not a violation of the duty of best execution, FINRA and the SEC have emphasized that firms receiving such payments should carefully evaluate the potential impact on execution quality. This enforcement action is a reminder for firms that, especially under heightened scrutiny when receiving payment for order flow, execution quality should be regularly and substantively analyzed, including assessing the execution quality of potential alternative routing arrangements.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More