ARTICLE
23 October 2018

FSOC Rescinds SIFI Determination From Prudential Financial; No Non-Bank SIFIs Remain

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") rescinded its determination that material financial distress at Prudential Financial, Inc. ("Prudential") could present a threat to U.S. financial stability.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The Financial Stability Oversight Council ("FSOC") rescinded its determination that material financial distress at Prudential Financial, Inc. ("Prudential") could present a threat to U.S. financial stability. As a result of the FSOC's decision, Prudential will no longer be subject to enhanced prudential standards. As a consequence of this determination, no non-bank financial company is deemed to be "systemically important."

In submissions to FSOC, Prudential argued that internal changes in its operations, and external changes affecting it, meant that material financial distress would not harm the U.S. economy. Prudential also argued that FSOC's prior analyses concerning the scale of potential insurance policyholder withdrawals and the potential for a resulting fire sale of assets were flawed.

Commentary / Steven Lofchie

It is all to the good that FSOC has removed all SIFI designations. It would be even better if Congress would repeal those provisions of Dodd-Frank allowing FSOC to designate institutions as SIFIs on the basis of standards that are completely open-ended and discretionary. Financial regulation, indeed regulation of any kind, ought not to operate on the basis of discretionary standards. See, e.g., Republican Staff Rips into "SIFI" Designation Process.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More