ARTICLE
3 October 2018

US Federal Financial Regulatory Agencies Reaffirm The Role Of Supervisory Guidance

AO
A&O Shearman

Contributor

A&O Shearman was formed in 2024 via the merger of two historic firms, Allen & Overy and Shearman & Sterling. With nearly 4,000 lawyers globally, we are equally fluent in English law, U.S. law and the laws of the world’s most dynamic markets. This combination creates a new kind of law firm, one built to achieve unparalleled outcomes for our clients on their most complex, multijurisdictional matters – everywhere in the world. A firm that advises at the forefront of the forces changing the current of global business and that is unrivalled in its global strength. Our clients benefit from the collective experience of teams who work with many of the world’s most influential companies and institutions, and have a history of precedent-setting innovations. Together our lawyers advise more than a third of NYSE-listed businesses, a fifth of the NASDAQ and a notable proportion of the London Stock Exchange, the Euronext, Euronext Paris and the Tokyo and Hong Kong Stock Exchanges.
On September 11, 2018, the Federal Reserve Board, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, OCC and Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection issued an interagency statement ...
United States Finance and Banking

On September 11, 2018, the Federal Reserve Board, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, OCC and Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection issued an interagency statement explaining the role and legal status of supervisory guidance. The statement highlights the difference between supervisory guidance on one hand, and laws and regulations on the other hand, noting that supervisory guidance, in all forms, does not have the force and effect of law, and that the agencies do not take enforcement actions based upon supervisory guidance. Instead, supervisory guidance outlines supervisory expectations or priorities, articulates general views regarding appropriate practices for a given subject area and can provide examples of practices that the agencies generally consider consistent with safety-and-soundness standards or other applicable laws and regulations.

The interagency statement also outlines ongoing steps that the regulatory agencies are taking to clarify the role of supervisory guidance, including, limiting the use of numerical thresholds or other "bright-lines" in describing expectations in supervisory guidance; not criticizing a supervised financial institution for a "violation" of supervisory guidance; seeking public comment with respect to supervisory guidance; limiting and reducing the issuance of multiple supervisory guidance documents addressing the same topic; maintaining clarity in communications to examiners and supervised financial institutions with respect to the role of supervisory guidance; and encouraging supervised financial institutions to raise and discuss any questions regarding supervisory guidance with their appropriate regulatory agency contact.

The full text of the interagency statement is available at: https://www.federalreserve.gov/supervisionreg/srletters/sr1805a1.pdf.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More