ARTICLE
28 September 2018

ARRC Requests Feedback Consultations On Fallback Contract Language

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The consultations provide draft language for new contracts that reference LIBOR in order to ensure that these contracts will continue to be effective if LIBOR is no longer used.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a significant step for the transition from LIBOR, the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") requested feedback on two consultations on U.S. dollar LIBOR fallback contract language for floating rate notes and syndicated business loans.

The consultations provide draft language for new contracts that reference LIBOR in order to ensure that these contracts will continue to be effective if LIBOR is no longer used. A primary goal of these consultations, which will be followed by consultations for other cash products, is to produce fallback provisions that are as consistent as possible across multiple markets, while recognizing the unique needs and practices of each.

In particular, the consultation on fallbacks for floating rate notes proposed specific trigger events and a "waterfall" for determining the replacement rate and spread adjustment that would become effective in various scenarios. The consultation on fallbacks for syndicated business loans proposed two approaches: (i) a hardwired approach (which is similar to the floating rate note approach) and (ii) a much simpler amendment approach, which includes a streamlined amendment mechanism that could serve as the first step toward a hardwired approach.

Feedback must be submitted no later than November 8, 2018.

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP represented the ARRC in the development of the consultations.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More