ARTICLE
9 April 2025

CFPB Plans Limited Enforcement Of Payday Lending Rule

SM
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP

Contributor

Businesses turn to Sheppard to deliver sophisticated counsel to help clients move ahead. With more than 1,200 lawyers located in 16 offices worldwide, our client-centered approach is grounded in nearly a century of building enduring relationships on trust and collaboration. Our broad and diversified practices serve global clients—from startups to Fortune 500 companies—at every stage of the business cycle, including high-stakes litigation, complex transactions, sophisticated financings and regulatory issues. With leading edge technologies and innovation behind our team, we pride ourselves on being a strategic partner to our clients.
On March 28, the CFPB announced that it will not prioritize enforcement or supervision of the remaining provisions of its Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans Regulation, which were set to take effect on March 30.
United States Finance and Banking
Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP are most popular:
  • within Cannabis & Hemp and Insolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring topic(s)

On March 28, the CFPB announced that it will not prioritize enforcement or supervision of the remaining provisions of its Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans Regulation, which were set to take effect on March 30.

According to the Bureau's public statement, it intends to focus its oversight on other areas it considers to be more urgent, including protections for military personnel, veterans, and small businesses. While the Bureau stopped short of formally suspending the rule, it signaled that it may propose additional rulemaking to narrow the scope of the current framework.

The 2017 rule initially included underwriting requirements intended to assess borrowers' ability to repay short-term loans.However, those requirements were rescinded in 2020, leaving only the "payment provisions" in place.These provisions are:

  • Limit repeated withdrawal attempts. The rule banned the practice of debiting a borrower's account after more than two failed attempts without renewed authorization, deeming this practice unfair and abusive.
  • Notice requirements. The rule requires that lenders give consumers certain notices, such as an advance notice before attempting to withdraw a payment for the first time and notice of the consumer's rights when two consecutive payment attempts fail.

Putting It Into Practice: The CFPB's decision not to prioritize enforcement of the rule's payment provisions reflects a shift in agency focus under new leadership (previously discussed here). While the rule is still effective as of March 30, lenders may see reduced supervisory scrutiny in the near term.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

[View Source]

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More