Where To Next For ASIC? Senate Economics References Committee Releases Its Report

KG
K&L Gates

Contributor

At K&L Gates, we foster an inclusive and collaborative environment across our fully integrated global platform that enables us to diligently combine the knowledge and expertise of our lawyers and policy professionals to create teams that provide exceptional client solutions. With offices spanning across five continents, we represent leading global corporations in every major industry, capital markets participants, and ambitious middle-market and emerging growth companies. Our lawyers also serve public sector entities, educational institutions, philanthropic organizations, and individuals. We are leaders in legal issues related to industries critical to the economies of both the developed and developing worlds—including technology, manufacturing, financial services, health care, energy, and more.
On 3 July the Senate Economics References Committee handed down its report on ASIC. The Senate referred an inquiry into ASIC in October of 2022 to examine the capacity and capability of ASIC...
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On 3 July the Senate Economics References Committee handed down its report on ASIC. The Senate referred an inquiry into ASIC in October of 2022 to examine the capacity and capability of ASIC to undertake proportionate investigation and enforcement action arising from reports of alleged misconduct. The report is generally critical of ASIC's performance as a corporate regulator. The report identifies several key issues. Chief among these is the broad remit of ASIC, ASICs approach to investigation and enforcement, and ASICs wider culture.

The report makes a number of recommendations, these include:

Separate functions

The report recommends that the government should consider separating the functions of ASIC between a companies regulator and a separate financial conduct authority. The Report notes the challenges of ASIC to fulfil its current remit due to its breadth and considers that the bifurcation of ASIC may assist it in better tackling its remit.

New approach to misconduct

The reports proposed making it a legislative requirement of ASIC or a future regulator to investigate reports of alleged misconduct at an appropriate rate and suggests that standards be developed to transparently report on ASICs response.

Amended funding model

The report also suggests reassessing the funding arrangements for ASIC to potentially increase funding directly resourced with the proceeds of regulatory fines. This would more closely follow the structure in other jurisdictions such as the United States and may result in ASIC or any alternative regulatory authority being considerably more active in its enforcement activities.

If the recommendations in the Report are adopted, we consider that ASIC's approach in respect of investigations and enforcement would likely become more proactive and potentially more regular.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More