ARTICLE
3 January 2022

SEC Rejects Listing Of Two Bitcoin ETFs

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
The SEC rejected two proposals to list and trade shares in two crypto exchange-traded funds .
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

The SEC rejected two proposals to list and trade shares in two Bitcoin exchange-traded funds ("ETFs").

The SEC rejected a proposal from NYSE Arca, Inc. ("Arca") to list and trade shares of the Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund. The SEC also rejected a proposal from CBOE BZX Exchange, Inc. ("BZX") to list and trade shares of the Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust.

The SEC assessed whether the exchanges (i) had a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with a significant, regulated market, and (ii) could effectively prevent fraudulent and manipulative activity. In the rejected proposals, the SEC noted its concerns over the abilities of the exchanges to adequately meet the requirements under SEA Section 6(b)(5) ("Determination by Commission Requisite to Registration of Applicant as a National Securities Exchange") in protecting investors and the public interest by preventing fraudulent and manipulative practices.

The SEC rejected Arca's argument that (i) liquidity, (ii) price arbitrage, and (iii) frameworks to value assets would be sufficient to mitigate potential manipulation.

Similarly, the SEC rejected BZX's proposal, concluding "that BZX has not established that it has a comprehensive surveillance-sharing agreement with a regulated market of significant size related to bitcoin," and "that BZX has not established that other means to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices are sufficient to justify dispensing with the requisite surveillance-sharing agreement."

As a result, the SEC found that both exchanges had failed to prove that they could meet their burdens under SEA Section 6(b)(5).

Commentary

Given the size of the Bitcoin market and the fact that futures trading of Bitcoin has been going on for awhile without problems, it would seem likely at this point that the SEC's refusal to permit the listing of Bitcoin ETFs is founded on a desire to not encourage further retail investment, including indirect investment, in the product. Although one can be sympathetic to the SEC's worries as to retail investors, the SEC is not supposed to serve as a gatekeeper on the wisdom of investments. See the 2020 dissent by Commissioner Hester M. Peirce as to SEC Rejects Proposal to List and Trade Bitcoins on Regulated Exchange.

Primary Sources

  1. SEC Order: Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the Valkyrie Bitcoin Fund under NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E (Commodity-Based Trust Shares)
  2. SEC Order: Disapproving a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the Kryptoin Bitcoin ETF Trust under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More