ARTICLE
1 December 2021

Broker-Dealer Settles Suitability Charges For ETF And Options Trading Violations

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
FINRA charged the broker-dealer with failing to develop appropriate oversight procedures for sales of non-traditional exchange trade products.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A broker-dealer settled FINRA charges for suitability violations, and related supervisory failures, as to the sale of non-traditional exchange traded funds and complex options positions to retail investors.

FINRA charged the broker-dealer with failing to develop appropriate oversight procedures for sales of non-traditional exchange trade products. FINRA previously warned broker-dealers that non-traditional ETFs, which return a multiple of an index or benchmark, "typically are not suitable for retail investors who plan to hold them for more than one trading session. . . ." (See FINRA Notice 09-31.) In the present case, the firm had no procedures to identify non-traditional ETFs or to monitor customers' holding periods. As a result, two senior customers held the products for multiple years.

Separately, FINRA found that the firm failed to supervise a representative offering complex options trading to customers. FINRA determined that a firm representative recommended trades with, in some cases, a maximum potential loss nine times higher than maximum potential gain, and in other cases, with an assured loss.

FINRA determined that the conduct violated Rules 3110 ("Supervision"), 2360(b)(20)(C) ("Options - Headquarter Review of Accounts") and 2010 ("Standards - Commercial Honor"), as well as NASD Rule 3010. To settle the charges, the broker-dealer agreed to (i) a sanction, (ii) a $35,000 fine and (iii) certification to FINRA of revised policies remedying the supervisory failures within 60 days.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: McNally Financial Services Corporation

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More