Firm Settles FINRA Charges For Best Execution And Supervisory Failures

CW
Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Contributor

Cadwalader, established in 1792, serves a diverse client base, including many of the world's leading financial institutions, funds and corporations. With offices in the United States and Europe, Cadwalader offers legal representation in antitrust, banking, corporate finance, corporate governance, executive compensation, financial restructuring, intellectual property, litigation, mergers and acquisitions, private equity, private wealth, real estate, regulation, securitization, structured finance, tax and white collar defense.
A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to ensure the best execution of its customers' over-the-counter orders and related deficiencies in its supervisory system.
United States Finance and Banking
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

A firm settled FINRA charges for failing to ensure the best execution of its customers' over-the-counter ("OTC") orders and related deficiencies in its supervisory system.

In a Letter of Acceptance, Waiver and Consent, FINRA found that the firm had a manual process for comparing customer executions with prices available at the same time through messages in an inter-dealer quotation system. FINRA concluded that the firm did not (i) take reasonable steps to execute against the market-maker's quotation within 30 seconds following its receipt of a customer's order, resulting in orders that were not promptly handled, or (ii) as a result of technology failures, promptly display customer orders.

FINRA stated that, as a result of the firm's inadequate related supervisory procedures, the firm did not provide best execution in connection with 41,505 customer orders. Additionally, the firm did not reasonably monitor limit order display requirements because its daily exception reports did not include orders that would have locked or crossed the market.

As a result of its findings, FINRA determined that the firm violated FINRA Rules 2010 ("Standards of Commercial Honor and Principles of Trade"), 3110(a) ("Supervisory System"), 5310 ("Best Execution and Interpositioning") and 6460 ("Display of Customer Limit Orders") and NASD Rule 3010(a).

To settle the charges, the firm agreed to (i) a censure, (ii) a $550,000 fine and (iii) $816,618.75 plus interest in restitution.

Primary Sources

  1. FINRA AWC: G1 Execution Services, LLC

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More