ARTICLE
18 October 2019

NLRB Holds That Misclassification Of Employees Is Not Per Se a Violation Of NLRA

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
On Aug. 29, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held that an employer's misclassification of its employees as independent contractors does not,...
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

On Aug. 29, the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) held that an employer's misclassification of its employees as independent contractors does not, standing alone, constitute a violation of the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Velox Express Inc. 15-CA184006, 368 NLRB No. 61. The NLRB reasoned that an employer's mere communication to its workers that they are independent contractors does not prohibit, or otherwise interfere with, the workers' rights to organize under Section 7 of the NLRA, as is required for a violation of Section 8(1)(a). Indeed, the NLRB held that such communications are privileged legal opinions under Section 8(c) of the act – even when the classification turns out to be incorrect.

In determining that an employer's misclassification is not a violation on its own, the NLRB focused on the complicated, fact-specific nature of independent contractor determinations. The NLRB recognized that these determinations are governed by a variety of complex federal, state and local regulations, and "[u] nderstandably, employers struggle to navigate this legal maze." As a result, the NLRB noted that "reasonable minds can, and often do, disagree about independentcontractor status when presented with the same factual circumstances." In light of these considerations, the NLRB held that creating a stand-alone violation for misclassification of employees would not only penalize employers whenever they were mistaken, but also would "significantly chill" the creation of independent contractor relationships. The NLRB found that such a result would be contrary to both Supreme Court precedent and Congress' intention when amending the act to exclude independent contractors from its scope. As a result, the NLRB declined to hold that an employer's misclassification of its employees as independent contractors is itself a violation of the NLRA.

However, the NLRB held that Velox did, in fact, violate the NLRA when it terminated its employee after she complained about being misclassified as an independent contractor. Although the misclassification alone was not an NLRA violation, the adverse action taken against the employee in response to her complaint was. Thus, employers should remain cautious when making classification decisions and acting pursuant to those decisions.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More