What Is A Reasonable Time Period For Enforcement Of A Florida Non-Compete Agreement?

It is often stated that non-compete agreements, in order to be enforceable, must be reasonable in both the duration and scope.
United States Employment and HR
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

It is often stated that non-compete agreements, in order to be enforceable, must be reasonable in both the duration and scope. Duration refers to the length of time for which a non-compete agreement remains valid and enforceable. Scope, on the other hand, refers to the geographic scope – the area in which the non-compete agreement will be enforced. This post will look at what constitutes a reasonable amount of time to enforce non-compete agreements under Florida law.

Florida's non-compete statute, Fla. Stat. § 542.335, creates rebuttable presumptions as to when a non-compete agreement's duration provision is enforceable. By that, the statute provides that the court "shall presume" a non-compete agreement between an employee and employer is reasonable if the non-compete agreement is enforceable for six months or less. If an employee and employer enter into a non-compete agreement that is enforceable for more than two years, such agreements are presumed under the statute to be unreasonable.

Note that Florida's non-compete statute creates no presumption for or against employer/employee non-compete agreements that have duration provisions between six months and two years. Further, although the statute creates presumptions for and against enforcement, the presumptions may be rebutted if a party shows a reasonable basis for the relevant duration provision.

Section 542.335's presumptions concerning duration vary depending on the type of non-compete being enforced. If the non-compete agreement is being enforced against an employee, the duration of the agreement must be shorter (six months) in order to be presumed reasonable. In contrast, non-compete agreements enforced against a distributor or the seller of a business are allowed greater durations. Non-compete agreements enforced against a distributor, dealer, franchisee or licensee of a trademark are presumed reasonable if the duration is for one year or less. Under section 542.335(1)(d)(3), non-compete agreements enforced against a seller of a business are presumed reasonable if the duration is three years or less.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More