Tackling Beauty Lookalikes

MC
Marks & Clerk

Contributor

Marks & Clerk is one of the UK’s foremost firms of Patent and Trade Mark Attorneys. Our attorneys and solicitors are wired directly into the UK’s leading business and innovation economies. Alongside this we have offices in 9 international locations covering the EU, Canada and Asia, meaning we offer clients the best possible service locally, nationally and internationally.
Counterfeiting and lookalikes significantly impact beauty brands, with lookalikes mimicking products without claiming authenticity, leading to revenue loss and brand dilution. To combat this, a robust IP portfolio including copyrights, design rights, and non-traditional trademarks is essential. Social media influencers fuel demand for these cheaper alternatives, exacerbating the issue. For further insights, see "The Psychology of Lookalikes" by Influence at Work.
UK Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Our friends at SnapDragon Monitoring recently wrote about the impact of counterfeiting and lookalikes on beauty brands.

I find the issue of lookalikes captivating as intellectual property enforcement can be quite tricky in those cases. Whilst counterfeit products very often integrate identical or confusingly similar word marks - they are "fake", non-authorised copies of the original goods - lookalikes instead mimic the product without claiming that they are the genuine article.

There are a lot of cases and discussions around supermarket lookalikes, but the problem is also affecting the cosmetics sector with an increasing number of "dupes" flooding the market. The difficulty is that there is clear consumer demand for such lookalike (and obviously cheaper) products. For example, I can see many social media "influencers" in the beauty space who actively look for, and share examples of, dupes to their online community.

The consequence these mimicking goods have on brands is mainly revenue loss and dilution (detriment to distinctiveness). The brand owner is not only losing out on sales - while the lookalike brand is taking unfair advantage of a certain consumer attraction - but the mark's ability to identify the goods as coming from its proprietor is also weakened because use of the dupe leads to dispersion of the identity of the earlier reputed mark by making it less unique.

The key to tackling beauty lookalikes is to have a robust IP portfolio, which, in addition to protecting the house brand and product names, has a strong "combination of rights" strategy, incorporating copyright, design rights, and non-traditional trade marks such as product packaging and get-up.

If you are interested by the subject of lookalikes and consumer behaviour, I recommend reading "The Psychology of Lookalikes" by Influence at Work.

At M&C, we have a team passionate about Beauty & Cosmetics who would love to have a chat if you have any questions on protecting your IP in this sector, or if you have encountered lookalike issues. Get in touch with Julie Canet, Becca Davey and Inès Garlantezec!

The rise of global e-commerce and the booming demand for beauty products have triggered a surge in counterfeit makeup products and lookalikes. This phenomenon poses severe threats to beauty brands, impacting their bottom line, tarnishing their reputation, and jeopardizing consumer trust and safety.

snapdragon-ip.com/...

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More