ARTICLE
20 September 2016

Post-Brexit Patent Litigation In Europe

RS
Reed Smith (Worldwide)

Contributor

Reed Smith (Worldwide) logo
Reed Smith is a dynamic international law firm helping clients move their businesses forward. By delivering smart, creative legal services, we enrich clients' experiences with us and support achievement of their business goals. Our longstanding relationships and collaborative structure enable the speedy resolution of complex disputes, transactions, and regulatory matters.
Although Brexit means that the UK can no longer be part of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), Brexit may increase the attractiveness of the current national litigation route as an alternative to the UPC.
UK Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Although Brexit means that the UK can no longer be part of the Unified Patent Court (UPC), which is only open to EU member states, Brexit may increase the attractiveness of the current national litigation route as an alternative to the UPC.

Following Brexit, the UK may become a more important patent litigation jurisdiction than it would have been as merely part of the federal UPC system. The UK's commercial significance means that companies will have to litigate in the UK as well as in the UPC. Brexit is also likely to increase English patent judges' willingness to grant pan-European declarations of non-infringement, paving the way for more complex and disruptive patent litigation strategies.

London IP partner Jonathan Radcliffe considers the effect that Brexit will potentially have on European patent litigation strategies in an article published by Bloomberg in August 2016.

Click here to read the article in full.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More