ARTICLE
11 August 2014

Excluded Subject-Matter: Are UK Tribunals Taking An Unnecessarily Restrictive Approach In Biotechnology Cases?

AI
Avidity IP

Contributor

Avidity IP
Senior Attorney Dr Marc Wilkinson reviews a number of recent UK decisions and critiques the current approach to the analysis of patentability.
UK Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

Many inventions in the field of biotechnology require the use of a computer.  The invention may, for example relate to a new way of handling or processing data so as to provide a more accurate diagnosis or genotype.  Whether such an invention is seen to provide a "technical effect" which would render it patentable, or whether the invention instead is considered to relate to excluded subject-matter are issues which lie at the heart of the prosecution of many cases in this area. 

In this article, Avidity IP Senior Attorney Dr Marc Wilkinson reviews a number of recent UK decisions and critiques the current approach to the analysis of patentability in this commercially important field. 

Download full article

Excluded subject-matter: Are UK tribunals taking an unnecessarily restrictive approach in biotechnology cases? 

This paper was originally published in Biotechnology Law Report, February 2014, 33(1): 27-42.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More