ARTICLE
3 January 2019

UK Issues Cryptocurrency Guidance; US Issues Remain

B
BakerHostetler

Contributor

BakerHostetler logo
Recognized as one of the top firms for client service, BakerHostetler is a leading national law firm that helps clients around the world address their most complex and critical business and regulatory issues. With five core national practice groups — Business, Labor and Employment, Intellectual Property, Litigation, and Tax — the firm has more than 970 lawyers located in 14 offices coast to coast. BakerHostetler is widely regarded as having one of the country’s top 10 tax practices, a nationally recognized litigation practice, an award-winning data privacy practice and an industry-leading business practice. The firm is also recognized internationally for its groundbreaking work recovering more than $13 billion in the Madoff Recovery Initiative, representing the SIPA Trustee for the liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC. Visit bakerlaw.com
This week, the U.K. tax authorities (HMRC) published guidance on the taxation of cryptoassets.
UK Technology
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

This week, the U.K. tax authorities (HMRC) published guidance on the taxation of cryptoassets. The guidance states that HMRC does not view such cryptoassets as currency or money – which aligns the HMRC view with the general U.K. regulatory position. The guidance identifies three types of cryptoassets:

  • Exchange tokens (including bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies)
  • Utility tokens
  • Security tokens

The guidance notes that labels do not control; rather, the functionality and substance do. The guidance focuses on the taxation of exchange tokens while noting that it also provides a beginning discussion point for rules that may ultimately be developed for the other types of tokens.

The guidance states that, in the vast majority of cases, individuals hold cryptoassets as a personal investment and hence will be liable to pay capital gains tax on any profits arising when they dispose of their cryptoassets. Only in exceptional circumstances would HMRC expect individuals to buy and sell cryptoassets with such frequency, organization and sophistication that the activity amounted to a financial trade – the profits of which would be subject to income tax rather than capital gains tax.

HMRC specifically notes that it does not consider the buying and selling of cryptoassets to be the same as gambling – the proceeds of which would be tax-free. This is a clear change of position from their March 2014 guidance, which stated "depending on the facts, a transaction may be so highly speculative that it is not taxable or any losses relievable. For example gambling or betting wins are not taxable."

Under the U.K. guidance, cryptoassets received from mining or from airdrops may be subject to income tax on receipt, depending upon the nature of the activity giving rise to the receipt. Cryptoassets received as earnings from employment are treated as "money's worth" and are therefore subject to income tax and national insurance contributions.

The U.K. guidance raises questions that are similar to those that must be addressed from a U.S. tax perspective when transactions in cryptocurrency occur. Some of these questions focus on:

  • The proper category of property in which to place tokens
  • Which types of transactions give rise to taxable gains or deductible losses
  • The applicable rate at which to tax gains
  • Application of employment compensation rules to cryptoassets (or rights therein), including when there are conditions of continued employment associated with the retention of such rights
  • Treatment of cryptocurrency or tokens received in exchange for performing some activity (e.g., mining, social actions, validating)
  • Actions that give rise to a taxable gain (or loss) when cryptocurrency is disposed of, as well as planning opportunities that can defer taxable gains
  • Tax treatment of forks – both hard and soft
  • Record keeping and reporting

In the absence of comprehensive guidance in the U.S. on cryptocurrency issues, taxpayers will borrow from other areas in doing their best to comply with their tax obligations – while identifying opportunities to optimize their tax situations when applicable doctrines permit.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See More Popular Content From

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More