ARTICLE
8 November 2010

No Trademark Protection Over Single Colour

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

In a judgment handed down on 21 October 2010, the Polish Supreme Court ruled that trademark protection cannot be used to monopolise individual colours; the spectrum is limited and it would not be in line with public interest or expectation to grant exclusivity over a particular colour.
Poland Intellectual Property
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In a judgment handed down on 21 October 2010, the Polish Supreme Court ruled that trademark protection cannot be used to monopolise individual colours; the spectrum is limited and it would not be in line with public interest or expectation to grant exclusivity over a particular colour.

Combinations of colours are commonly recognised by domestic and international courts as marks that can be distinctive in relation to goods or services. However, the Supreme Court ruled that trademark rights are only infringed when the proportion of colours and the manner in which those colours have been used cause the risk of confusion with the registered combination of colours.

The case concerned a claim by BP that its characteristic green and yellow colours was being used by another petrol station owner in its furnishings and decoration.

The Supreme Court ruling upheld BP's rights over the registered colour combination but did not prohibit the other petrol station from using different shades of the same colour combination in a different format so that the mark was not misleadingly similar to BP's.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 05/11/2010.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More