The Supreme Court in England has today issued its judgment in
the cases of Pitt v Holt and Futter v Futter.
It has disallowed the use of the Hastings-Bass rule to unwind
trustees' mistakes.
The cases considered whether a decision made by a trustee who
acted on professional advice could be declared void and set aside.
The concept, known as the rule in Hastings-Bass, had come under
attack by HMRC in cases where trustees sought to set actions having
adverse taxation consequences.
Please click
here to view our previous articles on trustees'
mistakes.
A full analysis of the Court's decision will be issued
shortly.
Originally published May 9, 2013
The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.
We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.