ARTICLE
25 October 2010

New Period of Limitation for Challenging Reassessed Tax Liabilities in Court

CC
CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang

Contributor

CMS is a Future Facing firm with 79 offices in over 40 countries and more than 5,000 lawyers globally. Combining local market insight with a global perspective, CMS provides business-focused advice to help clients navigate change confidently. The firm's expertise and innovative approach anticipate challenges and develop solutions. CMS is committed to diversity, inclusivity, and corporate social responsibility, fostering a supportive culture. The firm addresses key client concerns like efficiency and regulatory challenges through services like Law-Now, offering real-time eAlerts, mobile access, an extensive legal archive, specialist zones, and global events.

In July 2010 the Parliament of Ukraine established a new period of limitation for challenging decisions of state authorities in court.
Ukraine Tax
To print this article, all you need is to be registered or login on Mondaq.com.

In July 2010 the Parliament of Ukraine established a new period of limitation for challenging decisions of state authorities in court. In particular, the amended version of the Code of Administrative Procedure (the "Code") now provides for a one-month period of limitation for challenging tax decisions on reassessment of tax liabilities in court, compared to the previous three-year period of limitation.

The wording of the amended provisions of the Code, however, is not exactly clear, which potentially may give room for inconsistent interpretation.

To clarify the position, the Highest Administrative Court of Ukraine issued a clarification letter on September 27, 2010 whereby it confirmed that a taxpayer is allowed to contest a decision in relation to reassessed tax liabilities in court within one month of receipt of the decision by a tax payer.

Although such clarification letters are not formally legally binding and a taxpayer may attempt to plead the ambiguity of the amended wording in the Code in order to argue a longer period of limitation, in practice, the lower courts tend to follow such clarifications of the Highest Administrative Court of Ukraine.

Shortening of the period of limitation will compel tax payers to take more rapid decisions regarding whether to dispute tax authority decisions. This may in turn have greater impact on Ukrainian subsidiaries of international companies, which tend to have more complex, and thus more time-consuming, approval procedures to pursue any such disputes.

Law: Law of Ukraine On Judicial System and Status of Judges No. 2453-VI dated 7 July 2010.

This article was written for Law-Now, CMS Cameron McKenna's free online information service. To register for Law-Now, please go to www.law-now.com/law-now/mondaq

Law-Now information is for general purposes and guidance only. The information and opinions expressed in all Law-Now articles are not necessarily comprehensive and do not purport to give professional or legal advice. All Law-Now information relates to circumstances prevailing at the date of its original publication and may not have been updated to reflect subsequent developments.

The original publication date for this article was 20/10/2010.

Mondaq uses cookies on this website. By using our website you agree to our use of cookies as set out in our Privacy Policy.

Learn More